THE OAKMARK SELECT FUNDReport from Bill Nygren and Henry Berghoef, Portfolio Managers |
![]() |
| THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT IN THE OAKMARK SELECT FUND FROM ITS INCEPTION (11/1/96) TO PRESENT (9/30/04) AS COMPARED TO THE STANDARD & POOR'S 500 INDEX4 | ||||
![]() |
||||
| Annual Average Total Returns | ||||
| (as of 09/30/04) | ||||
| Total Return Last 3 Months* |
1-year | 5-year | Since Inception (11/1/96) |
|
| Oakmark Select Fund (Class I) | 1.00% | 13.64% | 14.29% | 20.21% |
| S&P 500 | -1.87% | 13.87% | -1.31% | 7.58% |
| S&P MidCap 4008 | -2.10% | 17.55% | 10.50% | 13.30% |
| Lipper Mid Cap Value Index9 | -0.95% | 22.69% | 10.79% | 10.09% |
| The graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. | ||||
| The performance data quoted represents past performance. The above performance information for the Fund does not reflect the imposition of a 2% redemption fee on shares held for 90 days or less to deter market timers. If reflected, the fee would reduce the performance quoted. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Average annual total return measures annualized change, while total return measures aggregate change. To obtain current month end performance data, call 1-800-OAKMARK or visit www.oakmark.com. | ||||
| * Not annualized | ||||
The Oakmark Select Fund increased in value by 1% during the quarter, bringing
the calendar year-to-date increase to 2%. Five stocks in the portfolio had double-digit
increases: Limited Brands, Sprint, Moody's, Burlington Resources, and Toys R
Us. We are pleased with continuing good results at these businesses. Earnings
at Burlington are increasing due to higher energy prices, and Toys R Us' decision
to explore selling their toy division highlighted its real estate value. We
can't tie the price increases for the others to any specific news. On the downside,
our double-digit losers were Gap, Office Depot and Janus. Modest sales and earnings
disappointments have not significantly changed our favorable long-term outlooks.
No new positions were added, and no existing holdings were eliminated during
the quarter. Our largest holding, Washington Mutual (WM), was up slightly after
a difficult second quarter. As we previously noted, WM reported a large shortfall
in its mortgage banking division. That negative news made WM our worst performer
in the second quarter. We did not sell our shares in WM because we had confidence
that their retail banking business alone was worth at least the current stock
price. Last month, we were pleased to have management report that cost-cutting
in mortgage banking is progressing well and that retail banking continues to
show good growth. We have kept WM as our largest position because of our confidence
that current business value exceeds the stock price, and because of our confidence
that business value is likely to grow at an above-average rate.
Shifting gears, this is the time of year when our taxable shareholders typically begin asking about capital gains distributions. The financial statements that appear later in this report show that including all gains taken through September 30, we have a very small capital loss carry forward. Fund distributions are based on October fiscal years, so trading this month will determine whether or not a distribution is necessary. We believe it is probable that no distribution will be needed for 2004, but if one is needed, at least it will be small. Given that our loss carry forward has been virtually exhausted, we can't promise the same for 2005. What we can commit to is that we will continue to manage the Fund to maximize the long-term, after-tax return of our investments.
Best wishes,
| William C. Nygren,
CFA Portfolio Manager bnygren@oakmark.com |
Henry R. Berghoef,
CFA Portfolio Manager berghoef@oakmark.com |
| THE OAKMARK SELECT FUND |
Schedule of InvestmentsSeptember 30, 2004
| Name | Shares Held | Market Value |
| Common Stocks91.9% | ||
| Apparel Retail7.8% | ||
| Limited Brands | 10,965,000 | $244,409,850 |
| The Gap, Inc. | 10,060,000 | 188,122,000 |
| 432,531,850 | ||
| Leisure Products3.8% | ||
| Mattel, Inc. | 11,770,900 | $213,406,417 |
| Movies & Entertainment4.4% | ||
| Time Warner Inc. (a) | 15,240,000 | $245,973,600 |
| Publishing3.1% | ||
| Knight-Ridder, Inc. | 2,606,500 | $170,595,425 |
| Restaurants6.7% | ||
| Yum! Brands, Inc. | 9,207,000 | $374,356,620 |
| Specialty Stores6.6% | ||
| Toys ‘R' Us, Inc. (a)(b) | 11,872,700 | $210,621,698 |
| Office Depot, Inc. (a) | 10,419,900 | 156,611,097 |
| 367,232,795 | ||
| Oil & Gas Exploration & Production3.8% | ||
| Burlington Resources Inc. | 5,183,600 | $211,490,880 |
| Asset Management & Custody Banks2.1% | ||
| Janus Capital Group, Inc. | 8,444,300 | $114,926,923 |
| Specialized Finance4.1% | ||
| Moody's Corporation | 3,123,600 | $228,803,700 |
| Thrifts & Mortgage Finance16.1% | ||
| Washington Mutual, Inc. | 22,917,400 | $895,611,992 |
| Biotechnology3.7% | ||
| Chiron Corporation (a) | 4,641,100 | $205,136,620 |
| Health Care Services3.6% | ||
| IMS Health Incorporated | 8,303,441 | $198,618,308 |
| Pharmaceuticals3.0% | ||
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 6,990,200 | $165,458,034 |
| Diversified Commercial Services11.7% | ||
| H&R Block, Inc. (b) | 8,459,800 | $418,083,316 |
| The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (a)(b) | 3,934,900 | 230,978,630 |
| 649,061,946 | ||
| Data Processing & Outsourced Services6.1% | ||
| First Data Corporation | 7,815,400 | $339,969,900 |
| Office Electronics4.2% | ||
| Xerox Corporation (a) | 16,746,400 | $235,789,312 |
| Integrated Telecommunication Services1.1% | ||
| Sprint Corporation | 3,034,600 | $61,086,498 |
| Total Common Stocks (Cost: $3,361,595,896) | 5,110,050,820 | |
| Par Value | ||
| Short Term Investments7.3% | ||
| U.S. Government Bills4.8% | ||
| United States Treasury Bills, 1.505% - 1.695% due 10/21/2004 - 1/6/2005 | $270,000,000 | $269,250,856 |
| Total U.S. Government Bills (Cost: $269,261,510) | 269,250,856 | |
| Repurchase Agreements2.5% | ||
| IBT Repurchase Agreement, 1.62% dated 9/30/2004 due 10/1/2004, repurchase price $138,006,210 collateralized by U.S. Government Agency Securities with an aggregate market value plus accrued interest of $144,900,000 | $138,000,000 | $138,000,000 |
| IBT Repurchase Agreement, 1.27% dated 9/30/2004 due 10/1/2004, repurchase price $765,690 collateralized by a U.S. Government Agency Security with a market value plus accrued interest of $803,947 | 765,664 | 765,664 |
| Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost: $138,765,664) | 138,765,664 | |
| Total Short Term Investments (Cost: $408,027,174) | 408,016,520 | |
| Total Investments (Cost $3,769,623,070)99.2% | $5,518,067,340 | |
| Other Assets In Excess Of Other Liabilities0.8% | 42,965,749 | |
| Total Net Assets100% | $5,561,033,089 | |
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | See footnote number six in the Notes to Financial Statements regarding transactions in securities of affiliated issuers. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.