THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUNDReport from Gregory L. Jackson and
|
![]() |
| THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT IN THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUND FROM ITS INCEPTION (8/4/99) TO PRESENT (9/30/03) AS COMPARED TO THE MSCI WORLD INDEX18 | ||||
![]() |
||||
| Annual Average Total Returns1 | ||||
| (as of 9/30/03) | ||||
| Total Return Last 3 Months* |
1-year | 3-year | Since Inception (8/4/99) |
|
| Oakmark Global Fund | 9.55% | 50.27% | 17.63% | 14.83%3 |
| MSCI World | 4.84% | 25.40% | -10.05% | -5.85% |
| Lipper Global Fund Index19 | 5.39% | 22.61% | -9.18% | -2.91% |
| The graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. | ||||
| Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value vary, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares. Average annual total return measures annualized change, while total return measures aggregate change. | ||||
| * Not annualized | ||||
Fellow Shareholders,
The Oakmark Global Fund had a strong quarter, gaining 10% for the three-month period ending September 30, 2003. This quarter's results compare favorably with the 5% increase for the MSCI World Index and the 5% increase for the Lipper Global Fund Index.
For the first nine months of calendar year 2003, The Oakmark Global Fund has returned 31%, compared to the smaller gains of 16% for both MSCI World Index and the Lipper Global Fund Index. Most importantly, since inception the Fund has returned 15% annualized compared to declines in the above indices.
Happy 4th Anniversary
On August 4th, the Oakmark Global Fund had its 4-year anniversary. We are proud of the record we have achieved over these past four years, with performance that is in the top 2% out of 187 global funds over that period according to Lipper.20 We feel this anniversary is a good opportunity to reiterate the philosophy of the Fund and revisit how we manage the portfolio.
Philosophy and Process
As with the other Oakmark Funds we believe superior long-term results are achieved by investing in quality companies purchased at significant discounts to the underlying business value. We base our investment decisions on our own intensive, independent, fundamental research, focusing on the long-term worth of a business. Equally important as the price we pay, we must have confidence that the priority of management is to make money for the owners, namely, us.
Inherent in our philosophy is the belief that, over time, a company's share price will reflect underlying business value. It may take time for this gap to close, perhaps, if the short-term uncertainty that created the opportunity persists. It is our job as analysts to determine whether the current share price is properly compensating us for this uncertainty.
Portfolio Construction
The Global Fund is built from the bottom-up on a stock-by-stock basis. We will never allocate money, as many global investors do, based solely on macroeconomic predictions of the various regions of the world. Too often this sort of top-down investing ignores valuation and, more important, the quality of the underlying companies in a particular economy. We certainly consider macroeconomic factors in our appraisals of companies, but never as a primary reason for making an investment.
| Highlights |
|
We like to characterize the construction process as "ideas battling their way into the portfolio on a stock-by-stock basis". Each idea is judged strictly on its merits, not whether it is a large or small cap, or where the company's headquarters is located. Strict discipline is maintained by adhering to individual stock buy and sell targets.
Position sizes within the Fund are determined primarily by the size of the perceived gap between price and value. Concentrationbigger weightings in fewer companiesis another important component of portfolio construction.
This is important, as we want our best ideas to have significant impact on the Fund's net asset value.
Probably the most unique aspect of the Oakmark Global Fund is its flexibilitywe are able to invest in companies of any size capitalization, in any industry, in any location. This flexibility allows us to go wherever value takes us.
Current Portfolio
Where value takes us today is primarily Europe, and in larger cap, blue-chip stocks. At today's prices, we continue to find better value outside of the United States. Looking at the composition of the Fund, the geographic breakdown is Europe & the United Kingdom 44%, United States 37%, Pacific Rim 14%, and Latin America 4%. Apart from the US the largest country weightings include the UK (11%), France (11%), Japan (8%), and Switzerland (8%). Among the largest industry concentrations include banking & financials, food & beverages, pharmaceuticals, information services and computer software.
We have very much enjoyed the past four years as managers of Oakmark Global. We appreciate your continued confidence and support.
| Gregory L. Jackson Portfolio Manager gjackson@oakmark.com |
Michael J. Welsh, CFA, CPA Portfolio Manager mwelsh@oakmark.com |
| THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUND |
Global DiversificationSeptember 30, 2003

| THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUND |
Schedule of InvestmentsSeptember 30, 2003
| Name | Description | Shares Held | Market Value |
| Common Stocks92.2% | |||
| Food & Beverage11.3% | |||
| Diageo plc (Great Britain) | Beverages, Wines, & Spirits Manufacturer | 3,885,000 | $42,041,811 |
| Nestle SA (Switzerland) | Food & Beverage Manufacturer | 139,100 | 32,072,048 |
| Lotte Chilsung Beverage Co., Ltd. (Korea)(b) | Soft Drinks, Juices & Sports Drinks Manufacturer | 13,430 | 6,375,499 |
| 80,489,358 | |||
| Household Products3.0% | |||
| Henkel KGaA (Germany) | Consumer Chemical Products Manufacturer | 328,700 | $21,065,972 |
| Broadcasting & Programming3.8% | |||
| Grupo Televisa S.A. (Mexico) (c) | Television Production & Broadcasting | 566,500 | $20,728,235 |
| Liberty Media Corporation, Class A (United States) (a) | Broadcast Services & Programming | 650,000 | 6,480,500 |
| 27,208,735 | |||
| Cable Systems & Satellite TV1.4% | |||
| AOL Time Warner Inc. (United States) (a)(d) | Multimedia | 675,000 | $10,199,250 |
| Human Resources1.7% | |||
| Michael Page International plc (Great Britain)(b) | Recruitment Consultancy Services | 4,815,400 | $11,966,936 |
| Information Services7.0% | |||
| eFunds Corporation (United States) (a)(b)(e) | Electronic Debit Payment Services | 1,845,000 | $22,785,750 |
| Ceridian Corporation (United States) (a) | Data Management Services | 1,025,000 | 19,085,500 |
| Equifax Inc. (United States) | Credit Reporting & Collection | 350,000 | 7,794,500 |
| 49,665,750 | |||
| Marketing Services3.5% | |||
| The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (United States) | Advertising & Marketing Services | 1,750,000 | $24,710,000 |
| Motorcycles0.4% | |||
| Ducati Motor Holding S.p.A. (Italy) (a) | Motorcycle Manufacturer | 1,933,500 | $3,174,492 |
| Retail5.8% | |||
| Bulgari S.p.A. (Italy) | Jewelry Manufacturer & Retailer | 2,890,100 | $23,270,731 |
| The TJX Companies, Inc. (United States) | Discount Apparel & Home Fashion Retailer | 900,000 | 17,478,000 |
| 40,748,731 | |||
| Bank & Thrifts1.8% | |||
| Banco Popolare di Verona e Novara Scrl (Italy) | Commercial Bank | 498,600 | $7,028,280 |
| Washington Mutual, Inc. (United States) | Thrift | 150,000 | 5,905,500 |
| 12,933,780 | |||
| Financial Services2.5% | |||
| Julius Baer Holding Ltd., Zurich (Switzerland) | Asset Management | 39,800 | $11,451,937 |
| Credit Suisse Group (Switzerland) | Investment Services & Insurance | 190,700 | 6,100,841 |
| 17,552,778 | |||
| Other Financial9.2% | |||
| Fannie Mae (United States) (e) | Mortgage Provider | 400,000 | $28,080,000 |
| Euronext (Netherlands) | Stock Exchange | 968,200 | 23,590,559 |
| Daiwa Securities Group Inc. (Japan) | Stock Broker | 2,062,000 | 13,967,432 |
| 65,637,991 | |||
| Managed Care Services3.9% | |||
| First Health Group Corp. (United States) (a)(b) | Health Benefits Company | 1,064,000 | $27,823,600 |
| Medical Centers2.6% | |||
| Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (United States) (a) | Medical Laboratory & Testing Services | 650,000 | $18,655,000 |
| Medical Products2.9% | |||
| Ansell Limited (Australia) | Protective Rubber & Plastics Products | 4,468,100 | $20,424,936 |
| Pharmaceuticals9.8% | |||
| Aventis S.A. (France) | Pharmaceuticals | 520,900 | $27,040,902 |
| Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Japan) | Pharmaceuticals & Food Supplements | 656,900 | 23,986,928 |
| GlaxoSmithKline plc (Great Britain) | Pharmaceuticals | 875,300 | 18,231,290 |
| 69,259,120 | |||
| Telecommunications1.7% | |||
| SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (Korea) | Mobile Telecommunications | 73,700 | $11,790,462 |
| Telecommunications Equipment0.7% | |||
| Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Class B (Sweden) (a) | Mobile & Wired Telecommunications Products | 3,470,000 | $5,060,790 |
| Computer Services5.6% | |||
| Concord EFS, Inc. (United States) (a) | Electronic Processing Services | 1,450,000 | $19,821,500 |
| Meitec Corporation (Japan)(b) | Software Engineering Services | 381,200 | 14,022,250 |
| First Data Corporation (United States) | Data Processing & Management | 150,000 | 5,994,000 |
| 39,837,750 | |||
| Computer Software3.9% | |||
| Novell, Inc. (United States) (a) | Network & Internet Integration Software | 3,000,000 | $15,990,000 |
| Synopsys, Inc. (United States) (a)(e) | Electronic Design Automation | 390,000 | 12,000,300 |
| 27,990,300 | |||
| Office Equipment2.4% | |||
| Neopost SA (France) | Mailroom Equipment Supplier | 362,050 | $16,790,775 |
| Airport Maintenance0.9% | |||
| Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (b)(c) | Airport Operator | 463,000 | $6,806,100 |
| Diversified Conglomerates3.6% | |||
| Vivendi Universal SA (France) (a) | Multimedia | 1,430,500 | $25,336,730 |
| Instruments0.6% | |||
| Orbotech, Ltd. (Israel) (a)(b) | Optical Inspection Systems | 228,700 | $4,674,628 |
| Chemicals2.2% | |||
| Akzo Nobel N.V. (Netherlands) | Chemical Producer | 497,800 | $15,528,245 |
| Total Common Stocks (Cost: $573,667,677) | 655,332,209 | ||
| Par Value | |||
| Short Term Investments9.2% | |||
| U.S. Government Bills7.0% | |||
| United States Treasury Bills, 0.845%-0.93% due 10/2/2003 - 10/23/2003 |
$50,000,000 | $49,988,023 | |
| Total U.S. Government Bills (Cost: $49,988,023) | 49,988,023 | ||
| Repurchase Agreements2.2% | |||
| IBT Repurchase Agreement, 0.95% due 10/1/2003, repurchase price of $13,500,356, collateralized by U.S. Government Agency Securities | $13,500,000 | $13,500,000 | |
| IBT Repurchase Agreement, 0.75% due 10/1/2003, repurchase price of $1,835,844, collateralized by a U.S. Government Agency Security | 1,835,806 | 1,835,806 | |
| Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost: $15,335,806) | 15,335,806 | ||
| Total Short Term Investments (Cost: $65,323,829) | 65,323,829 | ||
| Total Investments (Cost $638,991,506)101.4% | $720,656,038 | ||
| Shares Subject to Call | |||
| Call Options Written0.0% | |||
| Information Services0.0% | |||
| eFunds Corporation, December 15 Calls (United States) | Electronic Debit Payment Services | (100,000) | $(22,500) |
| Computer Software0.0% | |||
| Synopsys, Inc., December 35 Calls (United States) | Electronic Design Automation | (100,000) | $(80,000) |
| Total Call Options Written (Premiums Received: $(175,242))0.0% | (102,500) | ||
| Shares Subject to Put | |||
| Put Options Written0.0% | |||
| Computer Software0.0% | |||
| Synopsys, Inc., December 27.50 Puts (United States) | Electronic Design Automation | (100,000) | $(105,000) |
| Total Put Options Written (Premiums Received: $(80,746))0.0% | (105,000) | ||
| Other Liabilities In Excess Of Other Assets(1.4%) | (9,851,103) | ||
| Total Net Assets100% | $710,597,435 | ||
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | See footnote number five in the Notes to Financial Statements regarding transactions in securities of affiliated issuers. |
| (c) | Represents an American Depository Receipt. |
| (d) | Effective October 16, 2003, AOL Time Warner Inc. changed its name to Time Warner Inc. |
| (e) | A portion of this security has been segregated to cover written option contracts. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.