THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUND

Report from Gregory L. Jackson and
Michael J. Welsh, Portfolio Managers

Gregory L. Jackson photo Michael J. Welsh photo 


THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT IN THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUND FROM ITS INCEPTION (8/4/99) TO PRESENT (9/30/02) AS COMPARED TO THE MSCI WORLD INDEX19
chart
Average Annual Total Returns4
(as of 9/30/02)
Total Return
Last 3 Months*
1-year Since
Inception
(8/4/99)

Oakmark Global Fund -17.70% 6.84% 5.46%6
MSCI World -18.38% -19.18% -13.98%
Lipper Global Fund Index20 -17.53% -15.89% -9.80%

The graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value vary, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares. Average annual total return measures annualized change, while total return measures aggregate change.
* Not annualized

Fellow Shareholders,

The Oakmark Global Fund declined 18% for the three-month period ending September 30, 2002. This quarter's results are in-line with the 18% decline for the MSCI World Index and the 18% decline for the Lipper Global Fund Index. For the twelve-month period ending September 30, 2002, The Oakmark Global Fund increased 7%, which compares favorably versus the declines of 19% and 16% for the MSCI World Index and the Lipper Global Fund Index respectively. Our number one goal is to generate positive absolute returns, while hopefully outperforming the relative benchmarks in the process. We are happy to report that for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, The Oakmark Global Fund succeeded in achieving both objectives.

Value Philosophy Remains Unchanged

While investor sentiment continually shifts from optimism to pessimism or from a growth orientation to a value bent, our investing philosophy remains unchanged. Our value philosophy remains paramount to our past and future investment success. As a refresher, the three primary tenets of our value investment philosophy are: 1) To buy businesses that are trading for no more than 70% of our appraised value—offering a margin of safety between what we pay and what we calculate to be the company's underlying intrinsic value. 2) To buy companies that are growing per share value—buying statistically cheap businesses that don't grow has been a deathtrap for many value investors. 3) To invest with management teams that think and act like shareowners—when management's incentives are directly linked to increasing shareholder returns, both parties benefit. It makes no difference to us whether a company is categorized as being a "growth" or "value" business—we are agnostic when it comes to the types of businesses we own. What is important to us is that each company we buy adheres to our three primary investment tenets (our philosophy).

The Oakmark Global Fund has two distinguishing characteristics that differentiate it from other funds of The Oakmark Family: 1) The Global Fund is not limited to investing in any one country or geographic region, but rather we are able to invest anywhere in the world that we find attractive ideas, and 2) we can invest in companies of all sizes—small, mid, or large capitalization companies. In prior reports we have highlighted the benefits of being able to invest globally (point #1) and would now like to discuss the benefits of investing in companies of all sizes (point #2).

While we never target a specific "size" company, our research process often times leads us to companies or industries that are out of favor or which have declined significantly in price. It is important to note that the companies in our portfolio are selected individually on a company by company basis. In other words, we employ a bottom-up investment approach. Often times we find that companies in the same industry or market capitalization range become attractive at similar time intervals. Therefore, our portfolio may at times appear to be weighted towards a particular size company or a particular industry. For example, in late 1999 and early 2000 Morningstar positioned The Oakmark Global Fund in the small-cap value category based upon their proprietary style boxes. During late 1999 and early 2000, we found that most investors focused on large-cap growth companies and seemed to ignore many of the small to mid-size companies such as ITT Educational Services, Nova Corporation, Sterling Commerce, Hite Brewery, Telemig Celular and Denny's Japan. It just so happens that the Russell 2000 Value Index (a small cap value index) was the number one performing Russell category, returning an aggregate 55.8%, from October 1, 1999 through March 31, 2002. Therefore, targeting the out of favor small and midsize capitalization companies during late 1999 and early 2000 positioned the Fund towards the number one performing category over that two and one-half year time frame.

Highlights
  • We are indifferent to whether a company is categorized as "growth" or "value"—as long as a business meets our three investment criteria.
  • While we never target a specific "size" company, our process often leads us to out-of-favor companies or industries with significant price declines.
  • Recent worldwide stock market declines have given us a chance to own former large-cap "growth" businesses at very attractive prices.

Today, Morningstar positions The Oakmark Global Fund in the large-cap growth category based upon their proprietary style boxes. Has our investment approach changed? Definitely not! Rather, the once high-flying large capitalization growth companies of 1999 and early 2000 have seen severe share price declines, which now make them attractive investments based upon our three primary investment tenets. Our holdings today include Vivendi Universal, LM Ericsson, Grupo Televisa, GlaxoSmithKline, Liberty Media, Abbott Labs, First Data Corporation and Interpublic Group. Generally speaking, value investors are usually not given the opportunity to own such high quality, fast-growing businesses as those listed above because of the higher valuation levels typically afforded these companies. However, the recent worldwide stock market decline has given us a chance to own what historically have been labeled "growth" businesses at very attractive prices. Given the valuation levels of the large capitalization companies currently held in the portfolio, we believe the Fund is well-positioned as the economy and stock markets recover in the future.

Our investment philosophy, based upon our three primary tenets, will always be the driving force behind all our investment decisions. As you can see by the examples above, having the ability to own companies of any size and in any geography allows The Oakmark Global Fund the flexibility to move wherever the best ideas are found—we go wherever value leads us. Given the attractive prices and the quality level of the businesses currently held in the portfolio, we remain quite excited about the future prospects for The Oakmark Global Fund.

Thank you for your continued confidence and support.

Gregory L. Jackson signature Michael J. Welsh signature
Gregory L. Jackson
Portfolio Manager
gjackson@oakmark.com
Michael J. Welsh, CFA, CPA
Portfolio Manager
102521.2142@compuserve.com
THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUND

Global Diversification—September 30, 2002

pie chart

THE OAKMARK GLOBAL FUND

Schedule of Investments—September 30, 2002

Name Description Shares Held Market Value

Common Stocks—96.2%
Food & Beverage—1.6%
Lotte Chilsung Beverage
Co., Ltd. (Korea) Soft Drinks, Juices & Sports Drinks
Manufacturer 4,800 $2,826,532
Household Products—3.7%
Henkel KGaA (Germany) Consumer Chemical Products
Manufacturer 118,000 $6,584,329
Automobiles—1.7%
Ducati Motor
Holding S.p.A. (Italy) (a) Motorcycle Manufacturer 1,933,500 $3,055,239
Broadcasting & Programming—6.6%
Liberty Media
Corporation, Class A
(United States) (a) Broadcast Services &
Programming 1,000,000 $7,180,000
Grupo Televisa S.A.
(Mexico) (a)(b) Television Production &
Broadcasting 173,700 4,427,613

11,607,613
Broadcasting & Publishing—1.4%
Gemstar-TV Guide
International Inc.
(United States) (a) Electronic Program
Guide Services 1,000,000 $2,520,000
Educational Services—1.7%
ITT Educational Services,
Inc. (United States) (a) Postsecondary Degree Programs 161,600 $3,033,232
Home Furnishings—4.3%
Hunter Douglas N.V.
(Netherlands) Window Coverings Manufacturer 285,600 $7,615,581
Human Resources—4.0%
Michael Page
International plc
(Great Britain) Recruitment Consultancy Services 3,740,000 $6,985,884
Information Services—9.9%
eFunds Corporation
(United States) (a) Electronic Debit Payment Services 1,225,000 $11,491,725
Ceridian Corporation
(United States) (a) Data Management Services 425,000 6,056,250

17,547,975
Marketing Services—3.8%
The Interpublic Group of
Companies, Inc.
(United States) Advertising & Marketing Services 344,000 $5,452,400
Cordiant
Communications
Group plc
(Great Britain) (a) Advertising & Media Services 2,097,000 1,267,249

6,719,649
Retail—3.1%
Bulgari S.p.A. (Italy) Jewelry Manufacturer & Retailer 897,700 $2,978,870
Somerfield plc
(Great Britain) (a) Food Retailer 1,403,000 2,361,880

5,340,750
Bank & Thrifts—7.6%
U.S. Bancorp
(United States) Commercial Bank 275,000 $5,109,500
Washington Mutual,
Inc. (United States) Thrift 135,000 4,248,450
Banco Popolare di
Verona e Novara
Scrl (Italy) Commercial Bank 351,100 4,004,920

13,362,870
Other Financial—2.5%
Daiwa Securities Group
Inc. (Japan) Stock Broker 807,000 $4,451,866
Managed Care Services—3.7%
First Health Group Corp.
(United States) (a) Health Benefits Company 240,000 $6,508,800
Medical Products—6.2%
Cytyc Corporation
(United States) (a) Diagnostic Equipment 400,000 $4,288,000
Ansell Limited
(Australia) (a) Protective Rubber & Plastics Products 934,000 3,499,418
Guidant Corporation
(United States) (a) Medical Instruments 100,000 3,231,000

11,018,418
Pharmaceuticals—6.2%
GlaxoSmithKline plc
(Great Britain) Pharmaceuticals 362,400 $6,911,420
Abbott Laboratories
(United States) Pharmaceuticals 100,000 4,040,000

10,951,420
Telecommunications Equipment—3.1%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM
Ericsson, Class B
(Sweden) (a) Mobile & Wired
Telecommunications Products 14,923,000 $5,419,470
Computer Services—5.2%
First Data Corporation
(United States) Data Processing & Management 175,000 $4,891,250
Meitec Corporation
(Japan) Software Engineering Services 181,900 4,263,223

9,154,473
Computer Software—7.2%
Synopsys, Inc.
(United States) (a) Electronic Design Automation 220,000 $8,393,000
Novell, Inc.
(United States) (a) Network & Internet
Integration Software 2,000,000 4,200,000

12,593,000
Airport Maintenance—2.2%
Grupo Aeroportuario
del Sureste S.A. de C.V.
(Mexico) (b) Airport Operator 355,000 $3,905,000
Diversified Conglomerates—6.3%
Vivendi Universal
SA (France) Multimedia 983,400 $11,023,186
Instruments—1.9%
Orbotech, Ltd. (Israel) (a) Optical Inspection Systems 225,000 $3,318,750
Chemicals—2.3%
Givaudan (Switzerland) Fragrance & Flavor
Compound Manufacturer 8,970 $4,010,161
Total Common Stocks (Cost: $202,352,125) 169,554,198
Par Value

Short Term Investments—3.0%
Repurchase Agreements—3.0%
IBT Repurchase Agreement, 1.75% due 10/1/2002, repurchase price $4,000,194 collateralized by a U.S. Government Agency Security $4,000,000 $4,000,000
IBT Repurchase Agreement, 1.11% due 10/1/2002, repurchase price $1,187,300 collateralized by U.S. Government Agency Securities 1,187,263 1,187,263

Total Repurchase Agreement (Cost: $5,187,263) 5,187,263
Total Short Term Investments (Cost: $5,187,263) 5,187,263
Total Investments (Cost $207,539,388)—99.2% $174,741,461
Other Assets In Excess Of Other Liabilities—0.8% 1,472,340

Total Net Assets—100% $176,213,801


(a) Non-income producing security.
(b) Represents an American Depository Receipt.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.