THE OAKMARK SELECT FUND

Report from Bill Nygren
and Henry Berghoef, Portfolio Managers

  


THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT IN THE OAKMARK SELECT FUND FROM ITS INCEPTION (11/1/96) TO PRESENT (9/30/01) AS COMPARED TO THE STANDARD & POOR’ S 500 INDEX4

art2.gif (3787 bytes)

Average Annual Total Returns1

(as of 9/30/01)

Year to Date
Total Return*
(as of 9/30/01)
1-year Since
Inception
(11/1/96)

Oakmark Select Fund 16.40% 25.75% 28.63%
S&P 500 -20.39% -26.62% 9.80%
S&P MidCap 4007 -15.76% -19.00% 13.84%
Lipper Mid Cap
Value Index8
-6.88% -4.92% 8.18%

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value vary, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares. Average annual total return measures annualized change, while total return measures aggregate change. The graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that you would pay on Fund distributions or redemption of Fund shares.
* Not annualized

The Oakmark Select Fund lost 4% for the quarter, significantly outperforming the 17% loss in the S&P Midcap 400 and the 15% loss in the S&P 500. For the calendar year-to-date and fiscal year, The Oakmark Select Fund gained 16% and 26% respectively, compared to double-digit losses for both indices over both periods.

During the quarter, strong performances by several of our holdings allowed us to lose so little relative to the market. First, Office Depot increased by nearly one-third with most of that gain occurring shortly after the disclosure in August that Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway had acquired a stake in the company. We continue to be impressed by Office Depot’s growing and profitable Internet business and the U.S. retail store turnaround being engineered by CEO Bruce Nelson. In addition to Office Depot, stocks of businesses relatively unaffected by the slowing economy also performed well—H&R Block, Sprint and Moody’s each had gains of around 10%.

AT&T, a relatively new holding, also appreciated about 10% in the quarter. In July, a large cable operator, Comcast, approached AT&T about the possibility of issuing Comcast stock—to be distributed to AT&T shareholders—in exchange for acquiring the cable assets known as AT&T Broadband. We purchased AT&T stock last Fall believing that its disparate business units—business and residential long distance, AT&T Wireless and AT&T Broadband—represented underlying value far in excess of the AT&T stock price. In July, AT&T distributed to shareholders its stock in AT&T Wireless and now is focusing on extracting the maximum value from the Broadband assets. We believe that despite a price increase of over 40% this year, AT&T stock continues to sell at a discount to its business value and are pleased with the actions of AT&T’s management and board in their pursuit of value-maximizing transactions.

Looking back, it was another good fiscal year for our stock selection. In 1998 and 1999, when it seemed like everyone was outperforming us just by owning technology stocks, some wondered if our research team and its approach had become obsolete. We don’t get those questions anymore! In fiscal 2001, 75% of our holdings performed better than market, and 65% actually had positive returns. Our biggest gainers were H&R Block and Office Depot, but the largest contributor to the fund’s positive performance was our largest holding, Washington Mutual. In last quarter’s report, we extensively discussed the many reasons why we like Washington Mutual and, despite its strong performance, continue to want it to be the Fund’s largest holding. Without covering all that ground again, we should simply point out that as risk has increased in the economy, we expect more investors to appreciate Washington Mutual’s lower risk profile.

Highlights

  • For the fiscal year ending 9/30 the largest contributor to positive performance was Washington Mutual. Despite strong performance we believe it still deserves to be the Fund’s largest holding.
  • Office Depot, AT&T, H&R Block, Sprint, and Moody’s also turned in strong performances for the quarter.
  • The 2001 capital gains distribution will be zero.

Among the stocks that declined in value this year were two holdings—USG and US Industries—which were sold at large losses after we concluded that business values had permanently been impaired. The other decliners—Ceridian, Energizer and Visteon—are suffering from cyclically depressed results, but we continue to believe they are undervalued businesses run by shareholder friendly management where intrinsic value is likely to be substantially higher in the future.

The only good thing that resulted from selling stocks in which we lost money was that we captured tax losses. Those losses more than offset the gains we realized on profitable sales, so we will have zero taxable gains to distribute this year. When we started The Oakmark Select Fund nearly five years ago, most mutual funds were concerned only about their pre-tax returns. We, however, explicitly stated our goal of maximizing after-tax returns. While we have been very pleased with our pre-tax returns, we are especially proud of how little of our pre-tax return has been lost to taxes.

Average Annual Total Returns1
(as of 9/30/01)

Year to Date
Total Return*
(as of 9/30/01)
1-year Since
Inception
(11/1/96)

Oakmark Select21
Return before taxes 16.40% 25.75% 28.63%
Return after taxes 16.40% 23.69% 26.87%
Return after taxes
on distributions and
sale of Fund shares
9.90% 16.37% 24.04%

Past performance, before and after taxes, cannot predict future investment results.

* Not annualized

As explained in more detail in The Oakmark Fund report, we believe the outlook for the market and for us as stock pickers is positive. Although our portfolio has performed well, much of the market has been experiencing lower prices for the last year-and-a-half. Our goal, as always, is to concentrate The Oakmark Select Fund assets in our favorite stocks. There were no changes in our holdings last quarter, but we continue to scour the fallen angels in an attempt to either increase the portfolio’s expected return or decrease its risk. Thank you for your continued support.

bill.gif (396 bytes) henry.gif (315 bytes)
William C. Nygren, CFA

Portfolio Manager
bnygren@oakmark.com

Henry R. Berghoef, CFA

Portfolio Manager
berghoef@oakmark.com

   
October 4, 2001

 

THE OAKMARK SELECT FUND

Schedule of Investments—September 30, 2001

Shares Held Market Value

Common Stocks—91.3%
Apparel—2.3%
Liz Claiborne, Inc. 2,563,200 $96,632,640
Retail—16.9%
Toys ‘R’ Us, Inc. (a)(b) 12,223,500 $210,610,905
The Kroger Co. (a) 7,000,000 172,480,000
Office Depot, Inc. (a) 12,546,000 170,625,600
Tricon Global Restaurants, Inc. (a) 4,015,400 157,483,988

711,200,493
Household Products—2.4%
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (a)(b) 5,997,300 $99,675,126
Other Consumer Goods & Services—11.2%
H&R Block, Inc. 8,110,400 $312,737,024
Mattel, Inc. 10,073,000 157,743,180

470,480,204
Bank & Thrifts—16.1%
Washington Mutual, Inc. 17,519,700 $674,158,056
Information Services—8.9%
Moody’s Corporation 4,143,600 $153,313,200
The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (a)(b) 4,928,500 137,998,000
Ceridian Corporation (a) 5,834,500 84,600,250

375,911,450
Computer Services—8.6%
Electronic Data Systems Corporation 3,250,900 $187,186,822
First Data Corporation 2,965,200 172,752,552

359,939,374
Computer Software—2.8%
The Reynolds and Reynolds Company, Class A (b) 5,079,700 $118,357,010
Telecommunications—8.8%
AT&T Corp. 10,268,000 $198,172,400
Sprint Corporation 7,209,000 173,088,090

371,260,490
Publishing—3.5%
Knight-Ridder, Inc. 2,606,500 $145,573,025
Pharmaceuticals—3.8%
Chiron Corporation (a) 3,572,400 $158,507,388
Automotive—1.9%
Visteon Corporation 6,184,400 $78,851,100
Oil & Natural Gas—4.1%
Burlington Resources Inc. 5,024,500 $171,888,145
Total Common Stocks (Cost: $3,081,214,225)

3,832,434,501

Par Value


Short Term Investments—8.1%
U.S. Government Bills—0.5%
United States Treasury Bills, 3.35% due 1/24/2002 $20,000,000 $19,851,779
Total U.S. Government Bills (Cost: $19,785,972)

19,851,779

Commercial Paper—5.5%
Citicorp, 2.35% - 3.51% due 10/1/2001 - 10/10/2001 $60,000,000 $60,000,000
American Express Credit Corporation, 2.44%
due 10/5/2001 - 10/15/2001 60,000,000 60,000,000
Ford Motor Credit Corp., 2.45% - 3.00%
due 10/2/2001 -10/12/2001 60,000,000 60,000,000
General Electric Capital Corporation, 3.25%
due 10/1/2001 50,000,000 50,000,000

Total Commercial Paper (Cost: $230,000,000)

230,000,000

Repurchase Agreements—2.1%
State Street Repurchase Agreement, 3.05% due 10/1/2001,
repurchase price $90,701,047 collateralized by
U.S. Treasury Bonds $90,678,000 $90,678,000
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost: $90,678,000)

90,678,000

Total Short Term Investments (Cost: $340,463,972)

340,529,779

Total Investments (Cost $3,421,678,197) — 99.4% (c) $4,172,964,280
Other Assets In Excess Of Other Liabilities — 0.6% 23,776,551

Total Net Assets — 100%

$4,196,740,831



(a) Non-income producing security.
(b) See footnote number five in the Notes to Financial Statements regarding transactions in affiliated issuers.
(c) At September 30, 2001, net unrealized appreciation of $751,286,083, for federal income tax purposes, consisted of gross unrealized appreciation of $834,734,223 and gross unrealized depreciation of $83,448,140.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.