THE OAKMARK SELECT FUNDReport from Bill Nygren
|
|
THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT IN THE OAKMARK SELECT FUND FROM ITS INCEPTION (11/1/96) TO PRESENT (9/30/01) AS COMPARED TO THE STANDARD & POOR S 500 INDEX4 |
|||
|
|||
| Average Annual Total Returns1 | |||
(as of 9/30/01) |
|||
| Year to Date Total Return* (as of 9/30/01) |
1-year | Since Inception (11/1/96) |
|
| Oakmark Select Fund | 16.40% | 25.75% | 28.63% |
| S&P 500 | -20.39% | -26.62% | 9.80% |
| S&P MidCap 4007 | -15.76% | -19.00% | 13.84% |
| Lipper Mid Cap Value Index8 |
-6.88% | -4.92% | 8.18% |
| Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value vary, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell shares. Average annual total return measures annualized change, while total return measures aggregate change. The graph and table do not reflect the deduction of taxes that you would pay on Fund distributions or redemption of Fund shares. | |||
| * Not annualized | |||
The Oakmark Select Fund lost 4% for the quarter, significantly outperforming the 17% loss in the S&P Midcap 400 and the 15% loss in the S&P 500. For the calendar year-to-date and fiscal year, The Oakmark Select Fund gained 16% and 26% respectively, compared to double-digit losses for both indices over both periods.
During the quarter, strong performances by several of our holdings allowed us to lose so little relative to the market. First, Office Depot increased by nearly one-third with most of that gain occurring shortly after the disclosure in August that Warren Buffetts Berkshire Hathaway had acquired a stake in the company. We continue to be impressed by Office Depots growing and profitable Internet business and the U.S. retail store turnaround being engineered by CEO Bruce Nelson. In addition to Office Depot, stocks of businesses relatively unaffected by the slowing economy also performed wellH&R Block, Sprint and Moodys each had gains of around 10%.
AT&T, a relatively new holding, also appreciated about 10% in the quarter. In July, a large cable operator, Comcast, approached AT&T about the possibility of issuing Comcast stockto be distributed to AT&T shareholdersin exchange for acquiring the cable assets known as AT&T Broadband. We purchased AT&T stock last Fall believing that its disparate business unitsbusiness and residential long distance, AT&T Wireless and AT&T Broadbandrepresented underlying value far in excess of the AT&T stock price. In July, AT&T distributed to shareholders its stock in AT&T Wireless and now is focusing on extracting the maximum value from the Broadband assets. We believe that despite a price increase of over 40% this year, AT&T stock continues to sell at a discount to its business value and are pleased with the actions of AT&Ts management and board in their pursuit of value-maximizing transactions.
Looking back, it was another good fiscal year for our stock selection. In 1998 and 1999, when it seemed like everyone was outperforming us just by owning technology stocks, some wondered if our research team and its approach had become obsolete. We dont get those questions anymore! In fiscal 2001, 75% of our holdings performed better than market, and 65% actually had positive returns. Our biggest gainers were H&R Block and Office Depot, but the largest contributor to the funds positive performance was our largest holding, Washington Mutual. In last quarters report, we extensively discussed the many reasons why we like Washington Mutual and, despite its strong performance, continue to want it to be the Funds largest holding. Without covering all that ground again, we should simply point out that as risk has increased in the economy, we expect more investors to appreciate Washington Mutuals lower risk profile.
Highlights |
|
Among the stocks that declined in value this year were two holdingsUSG and US Industrieswhich were sold at large losses after we concluded that business values had permanently been impaired. The other declinersCeridian, Energizer and Visteonare suffering from cyclically depressed results, but we continue to believe they are undervalued businesses run by shareholder friendly management where intrinsic value is likely to be substantially higher in the future.
The only good thing that resulted from selling stocks in which we lost money was that we captured tax losses. Those losses more than offset the gains we realized on profitable sales, so we will have zero taxable gains to distribute this year. When we started The Oakmark Select Fund nearly five years ago, most mutual funds were concerned only about their pre-tax returns. We, however, explicitly stated our goal of maximizing after-tax returns. While we have been very pleased with our pre-tax returns, we are especially proud of how little of our pre-tax return has been lost to taxes.
Average Annual Total
Returns1 |
|||
| Year to Date Total Return* (as of 9/30/01) |
1-year | Since Inception (11/1/96) |
|
| Oakmark Select21 | |||
| Return before taxes | 16.40% | 25.75% | 28.63% |
| Return after taxes | 16.40% | 23.69% | 26.87% |
| Return after taxes on distributions and sale of Fund shares |
9.90% | 16.37% | 24.04% |
| Past performance, before and after
taxes, cannot predict future investment results. * Not annualized |
|||
As explained in more detail in The Oakmark Fund report, we believe the outlook for the market and for us as stock pickers is positive. Although our portfolio has performed well, much of the market has been experiencing lower prices for the last year-and-a-half. Our goal, as always, is to concentrate The Oakmark Select Fund assets in our favorite stocks. There were no changes in our holdings last quarter, but we continue to scour the fallen angels in an attempt to either increase the portfolios expected return or decrease its risk. Thank you for your continued support.
![]() |
|
| William C. Nygren, CFA Portfolio
Manager |
Henry R. Berghoef, CFA Portfolio
Manager |
| October 4, 2001 |
| THE OAKMARK SELECT FUND |
Schedule of InvestmentsSeptember 30, 2001
| Shares Held | Market Value | |
| Common Stocks91.3% | ||
| Apparel2.3% | ||
| Liz Claiborne, Inc. | 2,563,200 | $96,632,640 |
| Retail16.9% | ||
| Toys R Us, Inc. (a)(b) | 12,223,500 | $210,610,905 |
| The Kroger Co. (a) | 7,000,000 | 172,480,000 |
| Office Depot, Inc. (a) | 12,546,000 | 170,625,600 |
| Tricon Global Restaurants, Inc. (a) | 4,015,400 | 157,483,988 |
| 711,200,493 | ||
| Household Products2.4% | ||
| Energizer Holdings, Inc. (a)(b) | 5,997,300 | $99,675,126 |
| Other Consumer Goods & Services11.2% | ||
| H&R Block, Inc. | 8,110,400 | $312,737,024 |
| Mattel, Inc. | 10,073,000 | 157,743,180 |
| 470,480,204 | ||
| Bank & Thrifts16.1% | ||
| Washington Mutual, Inc. | 17,519,700 | $674,158,056 |
| Information Services8.9% | ||
| Moodys Corporation | 4,143,600 | $153,313,200 |
| The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (a)(b) | 4,928,500 | 137,998,000 |
| Ceridian Corporation (a) | 5,834,500 | 84,600,250 |
| 375,911,450 | ||
| Computer Services8.6% | ||
| Electronic Data Systems Corporation | 3,250,900 | $187,186,822 |
| First Data Corporation | 2,965,200 | 172,752,552 |
| 359,939,374 | ||
| Computer Software2.8% | ||
| The Reynolds and Reynolds Company, Class A (b) | 5,079,700 | $118,357,010 |
| Telecommunications8.8% | ||
| AT&T Corp. | 10,268,000 | $198,172,400 |
| Sprint Corporation | 7,209,000 | 173,088,090 |
| 371,260,490 | ||
| Publishing3.5% | ||
| Knight-Ridder, Inc. | 2,606,500 | $145,573,025 |
| Pharmaceuticals3.8% | ||
| Chiron Corporation (a) | 3,572,400 | $158,507,388 |
| Automotive1.9% | ||
| Visteon Corporation | 6,184,400 | $78,851,100 |
| Oil & Natural Gas4.1% | ||
| Burlington Resources Inc. | 5,024,500 | $171,888,145 |
| Total Common Stocks (Cost: $3,081,214,225) | 3,832,434,501 |
|
Par Value |
||
| Short Term Investments8.1% | ||
| U.S. Government Bills0.5% | ||
| United States Treasury Bills, 3.35% due 1/24/2002 | $20,000,000 | $19,851,779 |
| Total U.S. Government Bills (Cost: $19,785,972) | 19,851,779 |
|
| Commercial Paper5.5% | ||
| Citicorp, 2.35% - 3.51% due 10/1/2001 - 10/10/2001 | $60,000,000 | $60,000,000 |
| American Express Credit Corporation, 2.44% | ||
| due 10/5/2001 - 10/15/2001 | 60,000,000 | 60,000,000 |
| Ford Motor Credit Corp., 2.45% - 3.00% | ||
| due 10/2/2001 -10/12/2001 | 60,000,000 | 60,000,000 |
| General Electric Capital Corporation, 3.25% | ||
| due 10/1/2001 | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 |
| Total Commercial Paper (Cost: $230,000,000) | 230,000,000 |
|
| Repurchase Agreements2.1% | ||
| State Street Repurchase Agreement, 3.05% due 10/1/2001, | ||
| repurchase price $90,701,047 collateralized by | ||
| U.S. Treasury Bonds | $90,678,000 | $90,678,000 |
| Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost: $90,678,000) | 90,678,000 |
|
| Total Short Term Investments (Cost: $340,463,972) | 340,529,779 |
|
| Total Investments (Cost $3,421,678,197) 99.4% (c) | $4,172,964,280 | |
| Other Assets In Excess Of Other Liabilities 0.6% | 23,776,551 | |
| Total Net Assets 100% | $4,196,740,831 |
|
| (a) | Non-income producing security. |
| (b) | See footnote number five in the Notes to Financial Statements regarding transactions in affiliated issuers. |
| (c) | At September 30, 2001, net unrealized appreciation of $751,286,083, for federal income tax purposes, consisted of gross unrealized appreciation of $834,734,223 and gross unrealized depreciation of $83,448,140. |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.