THE OAKMARK FUND

Report from Bill Nygren and Kevin Grant, Portfolio Managers

nygren.jpg (9991 bytes) grant.jpg (9731 bytes)


THE VALUE OF A $10,000 INVESTMENT IN THE OAKMARK FUND FROM ITS INCEPTION (8/5/91) TO PRESENT (12/31/00) AS COMPARED TO THE STANDARD & POOR'S 500 INDEX1
graph1.gif (3997 bytes)
12/31/00 NAV9 $29.99 Total Return
Last 3 months*
Average Annual Total Return10
Through 12/31/00
From Fund Inception
8/5/91

The Oakmark Fund 12.82% 20.13%
Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index w/inc -7.82% 16.41%
Dow Jones Industrial Average w/inc11 -0.08% 16.89%
Lipper Large Cap Value Fund Index12 0.36% 15.08%
*Not annualized.

The Oakmark Fund increased 12.82% for the quarter ended December 31. This makes three consecutive quarters that the Fund increased in value while the S&P 500 declined. The big story in the stock market continued to be the declining NASDAQ2. Since its March 10 peak, the NASDAQ declined 50.99% and The Oakmark Fund increased by 40.89%! Although the NASDAQ decline has created some buying opportunities in specific technology companies, we continue to believe that the technology sector is overvalued.

The financial media reporting on the NASDAQ decline in 2000 tended to induce fear — Biggest NASDAQ drop EVER! Instead, the market action in 2000 should generate confidence. The system works — when stock prices become disengaged from business reality, the natural forces of supply and demand drive stock prices back toward fair value. We always strive to have our portfolio invested so that we benefit from those forces.

The positive side of supply and demand pushing prices toward fair value is the increase in demand for undervalued stocks. Frequently, this increased demand comes from the corporate sector when companies offer large premiums in acquisitions. In the fourth quarter, we again had a large holding acquired, ACNielsen. On Friday December 15, ACNielsen stock closed at $24 5/8. On the morning of Monday December 18, VNU, a Dutch media company, offered to buy ACNielsen for $36.75 per share, a 50% premium to the market price. That Monday, ACNielsen was our largest holding, accounting for over 4% of the portfolio. The merger has not closed yet, but we sold our stock when the price rose above $36. Waiting for the deal to close hoping to earn the last 75c per share didn't seem like a risk worth taking. Thank you to CEO Nick Trivisonno and the ACNielsen board for realizing that selling the company maximized shareholder value.

Total Returns
as of December 31, 2000

3 Months* 12.82%
6 Months* 19.70%
1 Year 11.78%
*Not annualized

Average Annual Total Returns
as of December 31, 2000

3 Year 1.26%
5 Year 9.84%
Since inception 20.13%

Portfolio Changes

Last year's highly volatile stock market, though viewed negatively by most, created many new opportunities for us. The divergence between a stock's price and its business value is what allows us to buy undervalued companies. Here's a brief explanation of the stocks that were added to our portfolio last quarter.

Gannett (GC—62)

Gannett stock price was over $80 a year ago. That price made sense to us. For this exceptional newspaper and broadcasting company, a price of 18 times next year's expected cash earnings seemed well justified. During the year however, GCI fell from over $80 to nearly $50, due largely to concerns about higher newsprint costs and a slowing economy. We believe these cyclical concerns do not affect GCI's intrinsic business value. With the stock now trading at just 13 times our estimates of this year's cash earnings, we are pleased to have the opportunity to own this fine company on our terms.

Liberty Media (LMG—12)

This company is a familiar name to long time readers. Through most of the nearly ten year life of The Oakmark Fund, we have held shares in Liberty Media. We sold our position a couple of years ago when we felt the stock price fully reflected underlying business value. Liberty continued rising after we sold and peaked in March at $31, as investors became excited about Internet opportunities for Liberty's wonderful cable TV programming assets. Liberty stock troughed at $11 last quarter, which is well below our estimate of business value. We have always admired Liberty management's singular focus on growing value. Their corporate mission statement is simply "To maximize the per-share-value of our stock over a 5-10 year horizon." We only wish all corporate managements understood that to be their job!

Highlights

  • Market action in 2000 illustrates that the market works — when stock prices become disengaged from business value, the natural forces of supply and demand drive prices back toward fair value.
  • Although the NASDAQ decline has created some buying opportunities in specific technology companies, we continue to believe that the technology sector is overvalued.
  • A corporate buyer acquired ACNielsen at a substantial premium in the fourth quarter.

Sara Lee (SLE—24)

Sara Lee is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer packaged goods. Its well-known stable of brands includes Hanes, L'eggs, Coach, Douwe Egberts, Hillshire Farms and, of course, Sara Lee. The stock, which traded above $30 in 1998, was in the teens for most of this year, despite expectations of 2001 calendar cash EPS of over $1.65. We became interested in SLE last quarter when they named a new CEO, Steve McMillan. Although we admired ex-CEO John Bryan for building SLE in the 80's and early 90's, we were pleased to see the new CEO shift goals away from sales growth via acquisitions to a tighter focus on growth in per-share value.

Top Five Industries
as of December 31, 2000

Industries
and % of
Total Net
Assets
Other Consumer
Goods & Services
12.7%
Retail 9.9%
Computer Services 6.2%
Banks & Thrifts 4.6%
Information Services 4.4%

Teradyne (TER—36)

Teradyne is a leading producer of test equipment for the semiconductor industry. In March, Teradyne stock peaked at $115; it troughed last quarter at $23! We find TER attractive not just because the stock fell 80%, but because the stock sells at 13 times estimated earnings. Although this industry goes through cycles, we expect continued strong long-term growth for semiconductors. That should allow Teradyne to continue compounding annual earnings at a high-teens growth rate.

Top Five Holdings
as of December 31, 2000

Company
and % of
Total Net
Assets
Mattel, Inc. 3.7%
Washington Mutual, Inc. 3.1%
Fortune Brands, Inc. 2.8%
AT&T Corporation 2.8%
The Black &Decker
Corporation
2.7%

Textron (TXT—47)

Textron is an industrial conglomerate with operations in the aerospace, automotive and finance industries. Textron has an enviable track record of compounding annual EPS13 growth at more than 10% for the last decade. Textron stock peaked at $98 in 1999 and hit a low of $41 last quarter. At the current price, TXT sells below 8 times expected cash earnings.

Thank you for your patience. The turnaround that began ten months ago helped make 2000 a good year for our Fund. We are well positioned to build on that success in 2001.

bill.gif (396 bytes)

William C. Nygren, CFA

Portfolio Manager
bnygren@oakmark.com

kevin.gif (472 bytes)

Kevin G. Grant, CFA

Portfolio Manager
kgrant@oakmark.com

January 8, 2001

THE OAKMARK FUND
Schedule of Investments—
December 31, 2000 (Unaudited)
Shares Held Market Value

Common Stocks—90.2%
Food & Beverage—3.3%
H.J. Heinz Company 1,125,000 $53,367,187
Sara Lee Corporation 807,400 19,831,763

73,198,950
Apparel—2.2%
Jones Apparel Group, Inc. (a) 1,327,000 $42,712,813
NIKE, Inc., Class B 100,000 5,581,250

48,294,063
Retail—9.9%
The Kroger Co. (a) 1,975,000 $53,448,437
Toys 'R' Us, Inc. (a) 3,000,000 50,062,500
Tricon Global Restaurants, Inc. (a) 1,400,000 46,200,000
CVS Corporation 630,000 37,760,625
J.C. Penney Company, Inc. 2,909,500 31,640,813

219,112,375
Household Products—4.2%
Newell Rubbermaid Inc. 1,700,000 $38,675,000
Energizer Holdings, Inc. (a) 1,504,600 32,160,825
The Dial Corporation 2,052,900 22,581,900

93,417,725
Household Appliances—1.7%
Maytag Corporation 1,160,400 $37,495,425
Office Equipment—0.9%
Xerox Corporation 4,325,000 $20,003,125
Hardware—4.4%
The Black & Decker Corporation 1,522,200 $59,746,350
The Stanley Works 1,224,900 38,201,569

97,947,919
Other Consumer Goods & Services—12.7%
Mattel, Inc. 5,594,400 $80,783,136
Fortune Brands, Inc. 2,080,200 62,406,000
H&R Block, Inc. 1,275,300 52,765,537
Cendant Corporation (a) 3,900,100 37,538,463
Galileo International, Inc. 1,311,200 26,224,000
Ralston Purina Group 750,000 19,593,750

279,310,886
Banks & Thrifts—4.6%
Washington Mutual, Inc. 1,300,000 $68,981,250
Bank One Corporation 900,548 32,982,570

101,963,820
Insurance—1.5%
MGIC Investment Corporation 475,000 $32,032,813
Information Services—4.4%
Moody's Corporation 1,489,400 $38,258,962
Equifax Inc. 1,220,500 35,013,094
The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation (a) 953,750 24,678,281

97,950,337
Computer Services—6.2%
First Data Corporation 1,040,000 $54,795,000
Electronic Data Systems Corporation 890,000 51,397,500
SunGard Data Systems Inc. (a) 640,800 30,197,700

136,390,200
Semiconductors—1.0%
Teradyne, Inc. (a) 600,000 $22,350,000
Telecommunications—4.2%
AT&T Corp. 3,500,000 $60,593,750
Citizens Communications Company (a) 2,350,000 30,843,750

91,437,500
TV Programming—1.7%
AT&T Corp. - Liberty Media Group, Class A (a) 2,806,200 $38,059,088
Publishing—3.2%
Knight Ridder, Inc. (a) 827,000 $47,035,625
Gannett Co., Inc. 372,400 23,484,475

70,520,100
Pharmaceuticals—1.0%
Chiron Corporation (a) 474,000 $21,093,000
Medical Products—0.9%
Apogent Technologies Inc. (a) 1,011,700 $20,739,850
Automobiles—2.3%
Ford Motor Company 1,500,000 $35,156,250
DaimlerChrysler AG (b) 400,000 16,480,000

51,636,250
Aerospace & Defense—2.9%
Lockheed Martin Corporation 1,000,000 $33,950,000
The B.F. Goodrich Company 820,000 29,827,500

63,777,500
Instruments—2.3%
Rockwell International Corporation 1,067,300 $50,830,162
Machinery & Industrial Processing—4.3%
Cooper Industries, Inc. 1,050,000 $48,234,375
Eaton Corporation 602,900 45,330,544

93,564,919
Building Materials & Construction—2.3%
Masco Corporation 1,933,000 $49,653,937
Chemicals—0.2%
PolyOne Corporation 697,500 $4,097,813
Utilities—2.2%
TXU Corp. 1,080,000 $47,857,500
Diversified Conglomerates—2.0%
Textron, Inc. 950,000 $44,175,000
Recreation & Entertainment—3.7%
Brunswick Corporation 3,024,200 $49,710,287
Carnival Corporation 1,050,000 32,353,125

82,063,412
Total Common Stocks (Cost: $1,810,357,029) 1,988,973,669
  Par Value Market Value

Short Term Investments—9.2%
U.S. Government Bills—0.9%
United States Treasury Bills, 6.03% due 5/17/2001 $20,000,000 $19,544,400
Total U.S. Government Bills (Cost: $19,544,400) 19,544,400
Commercial Paper—5.9%
American Express Credit Corporation, 6.52% due 1/3/2001 $10,000,000 10,000,000
Ford Motor Credit Corp., 6.50%—6.59%
due 1/2/2001—1/5/2001 70,000,000 70,000,000
General Electric Capital Corporation, 5.90% due 1/2/2001 50,000,000 50,000,000

Total Commercial Paper (Cost: $130,000,000) 130,000,000
Repurchase Agreements—2.4%
State Street Repurchase Agreement, 5.85% due 1/2/2001 $53,438,000 53,438,000
Total Repurchase Agreements (Cost: $53,438,000) 53,438,000
Total Short Term Investments (Cost: $202,982,400) 202,982,400
Total Investments (Cost $2,013,339,429)—99.4% $2,191,956,069
Other Assets In Excess Of Other Liabilities—0.6% 13,675,682

Total Net Assets—100% $2,205,631,751


(a) Non-income producing security.
(b) Represents foreign domiciled corporation.